A randomized phase II study of combination, alternating and sequential regimens of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of doxorubicin and docetaxel (DOC) administered either as a combination, an alternating or a sequential regimen in women with metastatic breast cancer. Secondary objectives included overall response, time to progression, survival and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with breast cancer (n=123) were randomized to receive doxorubicin and DOC either in combination (60 mg/m2 of each drug), or by alternated or sequential schedule (100 mg/m2 DOC and 75 mg/m2 doxorubicin) every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles as first chemotherapy for stage IV disease. A second randomization allocated patients from each arm to receive prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin or no therapy to prevent febrile neutropenia. RESULTS: Patients received a median of eight cycles. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response was 63%, 52% and 61% in the combination, alternating and sequential schedules, respectively. Corresponding rates of complete response were 15%, 14% and 11%. Grade 4 neutropenia was common in all arms (81%) and, together with febrile neutropenia, was significantly more frequent with the combination. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin did not reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia or infection. Other frequent non-hematological adverse events included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and asthenia. Congestive heart failure only occurred in the combination arm (10%). CONCLUSION: All three schedules are feasible and endowed of good therapeutic activity. In view of the more pronounced toxicity and the risk of cardiac events because of the higher exposure to doxorubicin, the combination should be least favored when treating women with metastatic breast cancer. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin was ineffective and is not recommended.

A randomized phase II study of alternating and sequential regimens of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of alternating and sequential regimens of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with MBC requiring first-line chemotherapy for progressive disease (n = 106) were randomized and received 3-weekly monotherapy with docetaxel (T, 100 mg/m2, 1-h i.v. infusion) and doxorubicin (A, 75 mg/m2, 20-30-min i.v. infusion) either on a cycle-by-cycle alternating basis (ATATATAT, n = 51) or sequentially each for four cycles (TTTTAAAA, n = 55). RESULTS: For both regimens, the median number of cycles administered was the maximum of eight. The alternating and sequential groups achieved similar objective tumor response rates (60% and 67%, respectively) and similar median duration of response (47 and 44 weeks, respectively). With a median follow-up of 31 months, median survival times were estimated at 20 and 26 months in the alternating and sequential groups, respectively. No unexpected toxicities were reported. Compared with alternating therapy, patients receiving sequential therapy were more likely to complete the planned eight chemotherapy cycles (69% versus 63%), and had a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia (2% versus 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Alternating and sequential docetaxel-doxorubicin regimens are viable alternatives to simultaneous combination therapy in MBC, with sequential therapy achieving slightly higher response rates and improved tolerability compared with alternating therapy.

Phase I study of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

This phase I was study conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Twenty-six patients were treated with cyclophosphamide (600 mg m(-2), intravenous bolus) followed by docetaxel (60, 75 or 85 mg m(-2), 1-h intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was docetaxel 85 mg m(-2) with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2), the dose-limiting toxicity being febrile neutropenia. Grade 4 neutropenia was experienced by all patients, but was generally brief. Otherwise, the combination was well tolerated with few acute and no chronic non-haematological toxicities of grade 3/4. Activity was observed at all dose levels and disease sites, and the overall response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 22-61%). The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not modified by cyclophosphamide coadministration. These findings establish a recommended dose of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) in combination with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2) every three weeks for phase II evaluation.

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anthracycline-containing regimens are widely used in advanced breast cancer. However, there is a need for new, non-anthracycline regimens that are active in patients for whom anthracyclines are contraindicated. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended doses of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs was also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four women with first-line metastatic breast cancer were treated with docetaxel, 60-100 mg/m2 (day 1), and vinorelbine, 20-22.5 mg/m2 (days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks and administered on an outpatient basis. RESULTS: Two MTDs were determined: MTD1 was defined at the dose level using docetaxel 75 mg/m2, and vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m2 DLT being a grade 3 stomatitis that was more related to the dose of vinorelbine than that of docetaxel. Therefore, the study continued with a fixed dose of vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2, and docetaxel 85-100 mg/m2. MTD2 was defined at the dose level combining docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2; DLTs were grade 3 stomatitis and severe asthenia. Fluid retention was observed in 41% of patients but was never severe or a reason for patient discontinuation. In comparison with historical experience, Daflon 500 did not seem to increase the efficacy of the three-day corticosteroid premedication by further reducing the incidence or severity of fluid retention. No significant neurotoxicity was observed and no patient discontinued the study due to this site effect. Activity was observed at all dose levels and at all metastatic sites, with an overall response rate of 71% (95% CI: 52.0%-85.8%). The median time to progression was 31.4 weeks (95% CI: 12-48 weeks) and median survival was 15.6 months (95% CI: 2.6-26.6 months). The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and vinorelbine were not modified between day 1 and day 3 when the two drugs were combined with the day 1 administration schedule used in this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for phase II studies are docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 (day 1), plus vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2 (days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks. At these doses, the combination was found to be active and well tolerated.

Phase II study of sequential administration of docetaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a sequential administration of four cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) followed by four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC; 60/600 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks), with subsequent consolidation with docetaxel or AC, as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients received 443 cycles of chemotherapy (median, 11 cycles/patient; range, 1 to 13 cycles). A total of 267 cycles of docetaxel (60.3%) and 176 of AC (39.7%) were given. Consolidation therapy was given to 33 patients (29 with docetaxel). RESULTS: Grade 4 neutropenia was the most frequent toxicity (83% of patients). This was not cumulative and was rarely complicated by febrile neutropenia or severe infection. The nonhematologic safety profile was favorable: there were no grade 4 adverse events, and grade 3 episodes were infrequent. Docetaxel-specific toxicities were generally not severe. With a median cumulative doxorubicin dose of 397 mg/m(2) (range, 150 to 543 mg/m(2)), two incidences of unrelated congestive heart failure after further treatment with anthracyclines and two of asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction decrease were observed. Among the 42 assessable patients, five (12%) had complete and 25 (60%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 71% (95% confidence interval, 55% to 84%). Median duration of response was 53 weeks (range, 12 to 72 weeks), and median time to progression was 46 weeks (range, 3 of 72 weeks). With a median follow-up of 40.4 months, median survival was 32 months (range, 2 to 55 months). CONCLUSION: This docetaxel-based sequential schedule is safe and effective in first-line therapy for MBC, without incurring cumulative toxicity, and provides a feasible chemotherapeutic option in this clinical setting.

Phase II study of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This pilot phase II study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) as first-line chemotherapy for anthracycline-naive patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients received a total of 359 courses consisting of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 given intravenously (IV) over 1 hour, preceded by IV doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for a maximum of eight 3-week cycles. RESULTS: After an independent panel review, the overall objective response rate was 77% (complete response, 6%). Overall objective response rates in patients with visceral, bone, and liver involvement were 82%, 82%, and 80%, respectively. Median duration of response was 52 weeks, and median time to progression was 42 weeks. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the median survival had not yet been reached, whereas the 2-year survival was 57%. The main toxicities were hematologic (neutropenia grade 3/4 in 100% of patients and 95% of cycles; febrile neutropenia in 34% of patients and 9% of cycles). Documented grade 3 infection was seen in one patient (2%) in one cycle, and no toxic death was reported. Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse events were infrequent, and docetaxel-specific toxicities (such as fluid retention and nail changes) were mild, with only one patient being discontinued for fluid retention. Congestive heart failure was seen in two patients (4%). CONCLUSION: TAC is an active and manageable regimen that has been chosen as the basis of five randomized phase III trials, including two pivotal studies comparing TAC to fluorouracil plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in the metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Long-term disease-free survivors in metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type.

PURPOSE: To review incidence and analyze profile of long-term complete responders among patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type (UCNT) treated at a single institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present a cohort of 20 long-term unmaintained complete responders to chemotherapy for metastatic UCNT treated at the Institut Gustave Roussy between April 1978 and November 1996. A patient was considered a long-term survivor if he or she was disease-free for more than 36 months without treatment after obtaining a complete response by chemotherapy. Patient characteristics were as follows: sex, 17 men and three women; median age, 28 years (range, 9 to 62 years); median World Health Organization performance status, 1; and initial tumor-node-metastasis stage (International Union Against Cancer-American Joint Committee on Cancer, 1987) of T3 to T4, 60%, and of N2b to N3, 75%. Epstein-Barr virus serology was characteristic in 19 patients. Of 16 pretreated patients, 11 were pretreated by radiotherapy alone and five by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Thirteen patients had metastatic relapses of locally controlled UCNT. Tumor sites were bone in 15 patients, lung in four, and liver (biopsy-proven) in two. Chemotherapy included the following: cisplatin, bleomycin, and fluorouracil in five patients; bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin in seven patients; fluorouracil, mitomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin in four patients; and fluorouracil, bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin in one patient. Three patients were treated with platinum-based regimens before 1985. Patients received a median of six cycles (range, three to 13). Thirteen patients with bone metastases received consolidating radiotherapy. RESULTS: As of June 1999, 14 of 20 patients were still alive with no evidence of disease after treatment (disease-free survival time, 82+ to 190+ months), three patients died of other causes while in complete response at 61, 109, and 208 months after treatment, and three patients died of disease at 42, 89, and 115 months after treatment. Long-term complete responses were obtained in both bone and visceral disease. CONCLUSION: Our data support a curative role for chemotherapy in metastatic UCNT and are a major incentive to continue research for better combinations to increase the percentage of patients with metastatic UCNT who attain complete responses and long-term survival.

Phase II trial of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin for patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharyngeal type.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin (FBEC) in the treatment of patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type (UCNT). The study included patients with metastatic or recurrent disease (Group A) and previously untreated patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic disease (T >/= 3 or any T, N >/= 2, M0, according to 1987 criteria of the International Union Against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (Group B). METHODS: From January 1992 to November 1996, 49 patients with histologically proven UCNT were treated with intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (700 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion for 4 days), epirubicin (70 mg/m(2) i.v. on Day 1), Bleomycin (10 mg i.v. bolus on Day 1 followed by 12 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion for 4 days), and cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on Day 5); this regimen was repeated every 21 days. Six cycles were given to Group A (26 patients), with bleomycin omitted during the last 3 cycles. In Group B (23 patients), only 3 cycles were given, followed by conventional radiotherapy (70 gray for 7 weeks). RESULTS: Of the 26 patients entered in Group A, 23 were evaluable for response. Nine complete responses (CRs) and 9 partial responses (PRs) were assessed, for a 78% objective response rate (ORR) (95% CI: 56-92). Three patients are alive with no evidence of disease after 43, 61, and 73 months, respectively. These patients achieved a CR with chemotherapy followed by consolidating radiotherapy to their target lesions. In Group B, the ORR was 91.5%, with 5 CRs (22%) and 16 PRs (69.5%) assessed in the 23 patients. Three months after the end of radiotherapy, the ORR was 87% (20 patients). After a median follow-up of 51 months (range, 24-67 months), 15 patients (65%) are alive without evidence of disease. Forty percent of cycles (51% in Group A, 25% in Group B) resulted in Grade 4 neutropenia, with fever and/or sepsis in 9.5%. Mucositis was seen in 42% of pretreated patients. There were 3 treatment-related deaths (2 from complications of infection and 1 bleomycin fibrosis at a total dose of 160 mg/m(2)), all of them in Group A. CONCLUSIONS: The FBEC regimen has good activity, with durable responses in patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent UCNT. This regimen is safe for patients with locally advanced disease, but close follow-up and supportive measures are needed when it is used to treat those with metastatic or recurrent disease.

Dose-finding study of docetaxel and doxorubicin in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin, and to evaluate the activity in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two women with untreated metastatic breast cancer (79% with visceral metastases; 52% with prior adjuvant anthracycline therapy) were treated with doxorubicin (40-60 mg/m2) i.v. bolus followed one hour later by docetaxel (50-85 mg/m2) one-hour i.v. infusion every three weeks, without G-CSF support. RESULTS: The MTD occurred at the dose level combining 85 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 50 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, with the DLT being neutropenic sepsis. Neutropenia and/or its complications were manageable and no grade 3-4 or severe non-hematological toxicities were observed. Fluid retention was frequent but never severe. With a median cumulative dose of doxorubicin of 392 mg/m2 (240-559 mg/m2) and a median follow-up time of 29 months (9(+)-41), no congestive heart failure was observed. High activity was observed at all dose levels, particularly the last four, with a response rate of 81% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 62.5-92.5). Median time to progression was 46 weeks (6(+)-62). Two-year survival was 66%, and median survival has not yet been reached. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel-doxorubicin is feasible, safe and highly active. The incidence of febrile neutropenia without G-CSF requires careful monitoring but is acceptable in this setting. There does not appear to be an increase in the cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin. The recommended doses is either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 or docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, administered every three weeks.

How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature on the longevity of routine dental restorations in permanent posterior teeth, and to identify and examine factors influencing its variability. METHOD: Accepted guidelines were followed. An advisory group oversaw the project. Simple Class I and Class II amalgam, composite resin, glass ionomer and cast gold restorations were covered. Comprehensive searching of electronic databases, hand-searching, and location of 'grey' literature, generated 124 research reports. Those considered relevant were assessed for validity and quality according to agreed criteria. The analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: Eight of 58 relevant research reports were categorised, according to agreed criteria, as being of satisfactory validity and quality. They suggested that 50% of all restorations last 10 to 20 years, although both higher and lower median survival times were reported. The findings were supported by the totality of studies reviewed. However, variability was substantial. Restoration type, materials, the patient, the operator, the practice environment and type of care system appeared to influence longevity. CONCLUSIONS: Many studies were imperfect in design. Those considered to be the most appropriate for analysis were too limited to undertake a formal statistical exploration. Therefore there remains a need for definitive randomised controlled trials of restoration longevity, of sound design and adequate power, employing standardised assessments and appropriate methods of analysis.

Docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin or vinorelbine.

The rationale for the development of a new drug combination is to combine optimal doses of drugs with single-agent activity that are not cross-resistant or have similar toxicities. Docetaxel, with its unique mechanism of action and its high response rates in metastatic breast cancer, provides both opportunities and challenges for the development of combination chemotherapy. Anthracyclines are widely accepted as the agents of choice for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer and they have been studied in combination with taxoids. Preliminary results with a combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin indicate an overall response rate of 74%, with the dose-limiting toxicities being neutropenia and infection. Vinorelbine also has single-agent activity against metastatic breast cancer and preclinical studies have demonstrated synergism when vinorelbine and docetaxel are combined. The dose-limiting toxicities of the vinorelbine-docetaxel combination are febrile neutropenia and mucositis. The overall response rate to treatment with this combination is 67%. We therefore conclude that docetaxel can be combined with doxorubicin or vinorelbine to provide high response rates and acceptable toxicity.

Docetaxel combined with vinorelbine: phase I results and new study designs.

This was a phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of vinorelbine (Navelbine) and docetaxel (Taxotere) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Vinorelbine dose, 20 or 22.5 mg/m2, on days 1 and 5, was followed on day 1 by docetaxel every 21 days, in doses increasing from 60 to 100 mg/m2. Two maximum tolerated doses were reached, the first at 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 22.5 mg/m2 of vinorelbine, and the second at 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 20 mg/m2 of vinorelbine. Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy was not observed. The recommended doses for phase II studies are 75 to 85 mg/m2 of docetaxel on day 1 and 20 mg/m2 of vinorelbine on days 1 and 5, every 3 weeks. The treatment regimen, which included 3-day corticosteroid prophylaxis, resulted in only mild fluid retention. Responses were seen at all dose levels, with an 80% overall response rate at the higher recommended dose; the overall response rate for patients at all dose levels was 66%. A high rate of response, including a complete response, was observed in patients with liver metastases.

Palliative treatment with low-dose continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil in recurrent and/or metastatic undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma type.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose protracted continuous infusion (CI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), as proposed by Lokich et al, has been reported to be active and well tolerated in colorectal and breast cancers. We initiated a phase II trial with CI 5-FU in heavily pretreated undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharyngeal type (UCNT) patients in February 1989. METHODS: Twenty-one UCNT patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease were treated with CI 5-FU (300 mg/m2) for 6 consecutive weeks. Treatment was to be continued until disease progression. RESULTS: Toxicity was mild. Diarrhea and mucositis (WHO grade 2 or greater) were seen in 4 (20%) and 6 patients (30%), respectively. Myelosuppression was infrequent, with only one patient with bone marrow invasion, experiencing grade 3 leukopenia. Two complete and 3 partial responses were obtained in 20 evaluable patients (ORR:25%). The median time to progression was 4 months (range 2-14); The median survival for the whole population was 10 months (avg 2-41). CONCLUSION: This appears to be a useful palliative treatment for heavily pretreated UCNT patients.

A multicentre phase II study of docetaxel 75 mg m-2 as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced breast cancer: report of the Clinical Screening Group of the EORTC. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

In this phase II study, 39 women (median age 51 years) with advanced breast cancer received docetaxel (75 mg m-2) intravenously over 1 h every 3 weeks as first-line chemotherapy for advanced disease, without routine premedication for hypersensitivity reactions. In 31 evaluable patients, an overall response rate of 52% (95% CI 33-70%) was achieved, including a complete response rate of 13%. The median time to first response was 12 weeks (range 3-35+), the median duration of response was 34 weeks (range 11-42+) and the median time to progression was 24 weeks (range 0-42+). Docetaxel showed considerable activity in patients with visceral involvement (52% response), including lung (67%) and liver (44%) metastases. The safety profile was acceptable. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 82% of patients (53% of cycles); febrile neutropenia (grade 4 neutropenia with fever > 38 degrees C, requiring antibiotics) occurred in only three (7.7%) patients (1.4% of cycles) and none of these required hospitalisation. Acute adverse events were generally well tolerated, with only two grade 3 events and no grade 4 events reported. Despite no prophylactic premedication, the incidence of acute hypersensitivity reactions was only 13%. Fluid retention was widely experienced (72% of patients) but was severe in only five (12.8%) patients and was the reason for discontinuation of treatment in 16 patients. Nevertheless, patients were able to receive a median cumulative dose of approximately 592 mg m-2 before discontinuing treatment, and the syndrome was slowly reversible after treatment withdrawal. In conclusion, docetaxel, even at a dose of 75 mg m-2, is confirmed to be an active agent in breast cancer. Compared with an earlier study of first-line docetaxel at the usual dose of 100 mg-2, it appears that 75 mg m-2 produces a lower response rate (52% vs 68%), although this still compares favourably with that of doxorubicin monotherapy in a similar patient population (43%). This difference is particularly striking in subgroups of patients with particularly poor prognostic factors, such as liver metastases or involvement of more than two organs. The incidence of fluid retention appears to be similar at the two doses and, it is likely that premedication with corticosteroids will be preferable to dose reduction for managing this adverse event.

Taxoids in combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

The rationale for the development of new drug combinations is to combine optimal doses of drugs with single agent activity which are not cross-resistant and have non-overlapping toxicities. Anthracyclines are widely accepted as the agents of choice for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer and have been tested in combination with the taxoids, docetaxel (Taxotere) and paclitaxel (Taxol). Toxicity problems have emerged using anthracyclines and paclitaxel, with sequence- and schedule-dependent toxic effects including dose-limiting typhlitis and mucositis, as well as febrile neutropenia and, in one study, cardiomyopathy. The dose-limiting toxicities of the combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin are neutropenia and infection, and preliminary results indicate a response rate of 89%. There is a need to develop a combination treatment regimen which is non-cross-resistant with anthracyclines. Vinorelbine (Navelbine) has single agent activity against metastatic breast cancer and has been used in combination with taxoids. The dose-limiting toxicities of the vinorelbine-paclitaxel combination are febrile neutropenia, pelvic pain, fatigue and paraesthesias. The dose-limiting toxicities of the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine are febrile neutropenia and mucositis. The overall response rate for this combination was 67% and studies are ongoing.

Phase I-II trial of recombinant interferon alpha-2b with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in recurrent and/or metastatic carcinoma of head and neck.

The aims of this study were to establish the feasibility and toxicity of the biochemical modulation of the cisplatin (CDDP)-5FU combination by interferon alpha-2b (INF), and to assess its therapeutic efficacy in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The mandatory eligibility criteria included histologically proven SCCHN; a performance status <2; adequate bone marrow, hepatic, renal, and cardiac functions; and measurable and/or evaluable disease. The protocol was CDDP, 100 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; 5-FU, 1,000 mg/m2 in a c.i.v. infusion over 96 h; and INF 3.10(6) U/day s.c., begun 2 h before cisplatinum for 5 consecutive days, repeated every 3 weeks. Twenty patients were included and received 76 cycles (median number cycles/patient = three). Eighteen patients were evaluable for activity with an overall response rate (RR) of 30% [2 complete responses (CR) + 4 partial responses (PR)], which was 55% (5/9) in previously untreated and 9% (1/11) in previously treated patients. Myelosuppression (50%), mucositis (40%), loss of electrolytes (15%), and asthenia (20%) were the most frequent severe toxic effects. Notwithstanding, the protocol was feasible and well tolerated in this overall population with a poor prognosis. Median duration of response was 8 months, and median survival for the overall population was 8.5 months. This schedule is the test arm of an ongoing international multicentric phase III trial versus standard CDDP-5FU in the same SCCHN population.

A multicentre phase II study of the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer: report of the Clinical Screening Group of the EORTC.

BACKGROUND: Two previous phase II trials of docetaxels as first line chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer have been conducted by the Clinical Screening Group of the EORTC. In these 2 studies, docetaxel 100 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2 were administered without routine premedication and produced overall response rates of 68% and 52% respectively. Fluid retention was the most problematic adverse event in these 2 studies in which premedication was not routinely administered. This study investigated the efficacy and safety profile of docetaxel with a 1-day prophylactic premedication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was administered intravenously over 1 hour, every 3 weeks, to 37 women (aged 29-65 years) with advanced breast cancer. A 1-day regimen of intravenous antihistamine and oral corticosteroids was given with each dose. Full doses of docetaxel were administered in 179 of 200 cycles (89.5%), giving a median relative dose intensity of 0.98. RESULTS: Tumour regression was achieved in 25 patients (7.66%) after a median of 7 weeks, and 2 patients (5.4%) had a complete response. Response rates were 67.9% in patients with visceral metastases, 76.9% in liver metastases and 83.3% in patients with > 2 organs involved. The median time to progression was 31 weeks (range 1-36+). After a median follow-up time of 6.9 months (range 4.6-9.4), 31 patients (83.7%) were still alive. The most common adverse events (AE) were neutropenia (97%), alopecia (97%, grade 1-2), fluid retention (89%, mainly mild to moderate) and neurosensory disorders (81%, mainly mild to moderate). Only 5 patients experienced febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalisation and/or antibiotic therapy. Sixteen patients discontinued treatment because of fluid retention; nevertheless, 13 of these achieved an objective antitumour response and none had any significant deterioration in performance status. AEs were generally reversible and easily managed, and there were no deaths attributable to docetaxel-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel produces very effective tumour response with acceptable tolerability when used as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. The 1-day premedication regimen used in this study was less effective in reducing the incidence and severity or delaying the onset of fluid retention than the currently recommended 5-day corticosteroid premedication. The optimum premedication regimen remains to be defined.

Final report of a phase II study of chemotherapy with bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin for locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharyngeal type.

PURPOSE: This article presents an assessment of the combination of bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy in the treatment of undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharyngeal type in patients with recurrent/metastatic disease (group A), and in previously untreated patients with locoregionally advanced disease (UICC-AJCC 87, N2-3, M0) (group B) in terms of toxicity, antitumoral activity, and therapeutic efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1987 to September 1990, 111 consecutive patients with histologically proven UCNT were treated with six cycles of intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m2 day 1) epirubicin (80 mg/m2 day 1), and bleomycin (15 mg bolus day 1), followed by 16 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 5 days, repeated every 21 days for three cycles. Three further cycles without bleomycin were given to 44 patients in group A. In group B (67 patients), only three cycles of the same protocol were given, with a slightly lower dose of epirubicin (70 mg/m2), followed by conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy/7 weeks). RESULTS: Of 44 patients entered in group A, 38 were evaluable for response. We observed 9 (20%) complete responses and 11 (25%) partial responses, for a 45% overall response rate. In 12 patients not previously given chemotherapy, there were 4 complete responses, compared to 5 complete responses in 32 patients previously treated with chemotherapy. Four patients are alive with no evidence of disease after 53+, 60+, 61+, and 72+ months. In group B the overall response rate to chemotherapy was 98% with 42 complete (62%) and 24 partial responses (36%). Three months after the end of radiotherapy, the overall complete response rate was 94% (63 patients). After a median follow-up time of 77 months (range, 53-94), the 4-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates for this group are 66% and 60%, respectively. The median disease-free survival has not been reached at 90 months. CONCLUSION: The results of the BEC combination trial are very encouraging in metastatic and recurrrent UCNT, with durable remissions in this poor-prognosis population. The results in patients with locally advanced disease have motivated prospective phase III testing of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy approach to evaluate its impact on locoregionally advanced disease (> or =N2MO UICC-AJCC 87).

Docetaxel is a major cytotoxic drug for the treatment of advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial of the Clinical Screening Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

PURPOSE: This trial investigated the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in women with heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 1992 to August 1992, 35 patients with advanced breast cancer from 29 to 65 years of age with a performance status of 0 to 2 were entered onto the study. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was administered every 3 weeks as a 1-hour infusion on day 1 without routine premedication for hypersensitivity reactions. Thirty-one patients were assessable for response. Previous adjuvant chemotherapy had been given to 11 patients. RESULTS: Five complete responses (CRs) and 16 partial responses (PRs) were observed, for an overall response rate of 67.7% (95% confidence interval, 49% to 83%). A CR occurred at 13 of 45 assessable sites (four liver, two lung, three breast, three lymph node, and one skin). The median duration of response was 44+ weeks, the median time to disease progression 37+ weeks, and the median overall survival time 16+ months. Among 34 patients assessable for toxicity (177 cycles; median, five cycles per patient), the following side effects were reported: nadir neutropenia grade 3 (three patients); grade 4 (31 patients); no grade 3 to 4 infection, acute hypersensitivity-like reaction (10 patients); grade 2 to 3 alopecia (all patients); and grade 2 to 3 nausea and vomiting (six patients). Fluid retention occurred in 26 patients and consisted of weight gain, edema alone (15 patients), or edema associated with serous effusion (11 patients). This side effect led to treatment discontinuation in 16 of 21 responding patients after a median of five cycles and a median cumulative dose of docetaxel of 574 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that docetaxel has major antitumor activity when used as a single cytotoxic agent as first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

Current status of Taxotere (docetaxel) as a new treatment in breast cancer.

Therapy for advanced breast cancer has not improved significantly in recent years, remaining strictly palliative in nature and intent. One approach to increase the effectiveness of the treatment is the introduction of active new drugs. Taxotere (docetaxel) is a taxoid derivative isolated from the needles of the European yew, Taxus baccata. Taxotere promotes the assembly of microtubules and inhibits their depolymerization. One EORTC Clinical Screening Group (CSG) phase II trial using Taxotere at 100 mg/m2, 1 hour infusion without routine premedication for hypersensitivity reactions, in first line chemotherapy, indicates a high anti-tumor activity: 5 complete and 18 partial responses in 32 patients assessable for response (overall response rate 72%, 95% CI 53%-86%). Other studies confirm this activity in first line and second line chemotherapy for advanced disease and in patients who are refractory to anthracycline containing regimens. Grades III and IV neutropenia without major infection, and grades I and II skin toxicity, were frequently observed adverse events. A fluid retention syndrome (chronic cumulative and non life-threatening toxicity) has been noted in patients treated with Taxotere. Methods for controlling fluid retention--dose reduction to 75 mg/m2 (which has little effect) or routine premedication from the start of treatment--are currently being studied.